AMERICAN ENERGY INNOVATION

MAY 25, 2012, DEAR MR. AUGUSTINE; 

I VERY MUCH ENJOYED YOUR TESTIMONY ON TV TUESDAY AND HAD

HOPES OF SUPPORTING WHAT HAD TO BE THE ANSWER TO A MUCH MEEDED NATIONAL ENERGY POLICY BECAUSE I SPENT MOST OF MY LIVE IN THE OIL & GAS ENERGY BUSINESS FOLLOWING 35 COMBAT MISSIONS AS A B-24 H PILOT WITH THE 8^TH AIR FORCE IN 1944.  SO MUCH SO THAT I COPIED ‘THE BUSINESS PLANS’ (2010), (OUR FRAMEWORK) AND (CATALYZING INGENUITY – 2011).

FOLLOWING WHICH I HAVE TO ASK IF YOU TRULY BELIEVE –“OUR CURRENT ENERGY SYSTEM WILL CONDEMN OUR CHILDREN TO A SERIOUSLY CONSTRAINED FUTURE UNLESS AMERICA MAKES SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO CURRENT POLICIES AND TRENDS”?

BECAUSE I HAVE SIX CHILDREN, NINE GRANDCHILDREN AND EIGHT GREAT GRANDCHILDREN THAT I FEAR OUR PRESIDENT WILL CONDEMN TO A LIFE OF DESPOTISN IF HE IS NOT IMPEACHED ASAP; BECAUSE, I BELIEVE OBAMA, HILLARY AND GEORGE (SCHULTZ) SOROS ARE DELIBERATELY IGNORING OUR CONSTITUTION INORDER TO DISTROY OUR COUNTRY FOR THEIR OWN BENEFIT.

AND, I AGREE WITH PROFESSOR WALTER WILLIAMS AT GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY THAT WE CANNOT VOTE HIM OUT OF OFFICE IN NOVEMBER.

LIKEWISE, I DO NOT AGREE WITH YOUR ASSUMPTION THAT OUR SYSTEM OF RELIENCE ON HYDROCARBONS IS THE PROBLEM. THE POLICIES OF OUR MEMBERS IN CONGRESS, LEAD BY CHICAGO POLITICS OF EXTROTION, IS NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR NATION CONTRARY TO THEIR SWORN OATHS TO PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION, WHICH STILL IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.

AND, NEITHER IS THAT WHICH YOU AND YOUR COUNCIL IS PROPOSING. YOU EXPOSE THE FALACY OF YOUR OBJECTIVE IN BOTH OF YOUR TWO REASONS FOR SPEAKING OUT ON THIS ISSUE.  IN BOTH REASONS YOUR EMPHASIS IS ON COST (PROFIT) THAT COULD MAKE YOUR PROPOSAL MORE ATTRACTIVE TO INVESTORS WITHOUT EXPOSEING THE FAILURE TO PROVIDE EVIDENTS THAT IT WOULD OR COULD SATISFY THE NATION’S NEED FOR PRESENT AND FUTURE UNINTERRUPTED ENERGY

AT THE SAME TIME; YOU ARE IGNORING ALL POSSIBLITIES FOR TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD MAKE OUR KNOWN UNCONSTRAINED HYDROCARBON ENERGY JUST AS EFFICIENT, SECURE AND COMPATIBLE WITH A CLEAN FUTURE INORDER TO MAINTAIN AMERICA’S LONGTERM COMPETITIVENESS AND VERY EXISTANCE.

CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG. I THINK I READ YOUR PROPOSAL AS BEING IN LINE WITH WHAT PRESIDENT OBAMA WANTS AND AS LONG AS HE REMAINS PRESIDENT HE WILL SET THE STANDARDS FOR THE NATIONS ENERGY.

 SO HOW DO YOU SQUARE THAT WITH “OVERALL RESEARCH GOALS AND DESIRED SOCIAL (NATIONAL?) BENEFITS SHOULD BE EXPLICIT”? DOES THAT NOT MEAN WE SHOULD HAVE A NATIONAL ENERGY POLICY BASED ON FACTS AND SCIENCE INSTEAD OF POLITICS?  AND DO YOU NOT AGREE THAT THE FIRST ORDER OF CHANGE SHOULD BE THE PRESIDENT?

NEXT TO THE CONSTITUTION, THE NATION’S DEPENDABLE SOURCE OF ENERGY IS MOST IMPORTANT TO OUR BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY TO OUR SELVES AND OUR POSTERITY.

HHH: BE HAPPY, HEALTHY AND THANK GOD FOR HYDROCARBONS ON WHICH THE WORLD IS BUILT. LOOK AROUND FOR THE EVIDENCE OF SOURCES OF COAL, BITUMINOUS COAL, BITUMEN, EXTRA HEAVY CRUDE OIL REMAINING IN LARGE RESEVOIRS THAT HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED AND ONLY THE LIGHT TO INTERMEDATE CRUDE OIL HAS BEEN PRODUCED AND RENEWABLE CLEAN WATER (H2O).

SINCERELY,

ARNOLD J. NASS

TYLER, TEXAS 75703

903/534-0744

AMERICAN ENERGY INNOVATION COUNCIL

Norman Augustine, age 77, former CEO of Lockheed Martin

Uroula M. Burns

John Doerr, age 61, Investor

Bill Gates, age 57, Founder and COB OF Board of Directors

Chad Halliday, age 64, COB of Bank of America

Jeffry R. Immelt, age 56, CEO of General Electric

Tim Solas, music