Friday, August 17, 2012
Patriot or Traitor: N O T I C E
Patriot or Traitor: N O T I C E: N O T I C E IF YOU ARE A KNOWLEDGEABLE AND VIRTUOUS CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT FOR AND PROT...
Thursday, August 16, 2012
N O T I C E
N
O T I
C E
IF YOU ARE
A KNOWLEDGEABLE AND VIRTUOUS CITIZEN
OF THE UNITED STATES
WITH
RESPECT FOR AND PROTECTION OF THE
CONSTITUTION,
RESPECT FOR
AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE SUPREME LAW
OF THE LAND BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES
AND
RESPECT FOR
AND ENFORCEMENT OF AMENDMENT 14,
SECTION 3 AS VALID TO ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES
AS PART OF THIS CONSTITUTION
“No person shall hold any office,
civil or military, under the United States, who having previously
taken an oath as an officer of the United States to support the Constitution of the United States,
taken an oath as an officer of the United States to support the Constitution of the United States,
shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same”
AND
AGREE THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS NOT ONLY
BETRAYED
HIS TRUST IN MANY WAYS,
INCLUDING FAILURE TO
TAKE CARE THAT THE
SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND BE FAITHFULLY
EXECUTED
WITH RESPECT TO ILLEGAL EMIGRANTS
AND
COULD BE
REMOVED FROM OFFICE ON IMPEACHMENT
FOR AND CONVICTION OF TREASON
EXCEPT THAT
ARTICLE III,
SECTION 3 DEFINES TREASON AS SOMETHING
OTHER THAN BETRAYAL OF A TRUST
BUT
PRESIDENT
OBAMA IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE RE-ELECTED
AS PRESIDENT BECAUSE HE HAS
ENGAGED IN
REBELLION AGAINST THE CONGRESS AND
THE CONSTITUTION IN MANY
WAYS DESIGNED TO
REDUCE WE THE PEOPLE UNDER
ABSOLUTE DESPOTISM
THEREFORE
HE SHOULD
NOT APPEAR ON THE BALLOT FOR THIS
ELECTION
AND
WE THE
PEOPLE, CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES, IN
BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES, ARE HEREBY DEMANDING
THAT
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY REMOVE PRESIDENT
OBAMA’S NAME FROM ITS BALLOT PURSUANT TO
AMENDMENT 14, SECTION 3 ABOVE
AND
IF THEY DO
NOT, THEN ALL VOTES FOR OBAMA WILL BE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND OF NO FORCE OR
EFFECT
UNLESS
CONGRESS,
BY A VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF EACH HOUSE,
REMOVES SUCH DISABILITY
AUTHOR
UNKNOWN AUGUST 13,
2012
DECISION TIME AMENDED
WHAT YOU PERMIT – YOU PROMOTE
YOU ONLY HAVE THE RIGHTS YOU
ARE WILLING TO FIGHT FOR.
THOSE WHO TRADE LIBERTY FOR SECURITY HAVE
NEITHER:
JOHN ADAMS
NO 1
Continue trying to control spending.
It will not happen
NO 2
Regulate use of capital assets and repeal distribution
of income tax to control spending.
It is not likely to happen
NO 3
A bloody revolution could happen at any time now.
NO 4
Vote Obama out of office in 2011.
Impossible
Unless you are willing to fight them on
their terms
Chicago (extortion) politics
NO 5
Who has the best organization and the most
money?
George (Schwartz) Soros
Who has control of the Federal Reserve?
Obama
He is chairman of the Board of Directors
Who has the most dependent voters?
Obama
TO KEEP ON WAITING IS MADNESS
THE CATASTROPHE IS NOT COMING, IT IS HERE.
WE ARE ALREADY WITHIN THE COLLAPSE OF OUR
CIVILIZATION
ALL PREVIOUS DEMOCRACIES HAVE
COMMITTED SUICIDE
AND
THE UNITED STATES IS DOING THE
SAME
ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4
THE UNITED STATES SHALL GUARANTEE TO EVERY STATE IN THIS UNION
A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT.
IF THE WORD GUARANTEE
MEANS ANYTHING, ALL THREE BRANCHES OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES HAVE
FAILED TO HONOR THEIR COMMITMENTS TO EVERY STATE IN THE UNION.
THEREFORE ALL OF THEIR POWERS HAVE IPSO FACTO REPOSED
TO THE STATES.
AND
ARTICLE VI, CLAUSE 3
THE SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES
BEFORE-MENTIONED, AND MEMBERS OF THE SEVERAL STATE LEGISLATURES, AND ALL
EXECUTIVES AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS, BOTH OF THE UNITED STATES AND OF THE SEVERAL
STATES, SHALL BE BOUND BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION TO SUPPORT THIS CONSTITUTION.
WHAT ARE THEY WAITING FOR?
THE GOVERNORS AND THE STATE LEGISLATURES ARE
THE SOVEREIGNTY IN OUR STEAD AND AS
SUCH THEY HAVE THE POWER TO ACT SUBJECT ONLY TO THE POWERS THEY MADE AVAILABLE
TO THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT IN THE CONSTITUTION, AS LEGALLY AMENDED, SO LONG AS
IT
SUPPORTED AND PROTECTED THE CONSTITUTION.
WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE RIGHTFUL
MASTERS OF BOTH CONGRESS AND THE COURTS, NOT
TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTION BUT TO OVERTHROW THE MEN WHO PERVERT THE
CONSTITUTION.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
THEREFORE
WE NEED THOSE GOVERNOR AND LEGISLATURES
TO PUT THEIR HONOR BEFORE FEAR, PARTY LOYALTY, AND PERSONAL AMBITIONS
ARNOLD J. NASS, TYLER, TEXAS 903/534-0744
Monday, August 13, 2012
OBAMA IN VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
N
O T I
C E
IF YOU ARE
A KNOWLEDGEABLE AND VIRTUOUS CITIZEN OF THE
UNITED STATES
WITH RESPECT FOR AND PROTECTION OF THE
CONSTITUTION,
RESPECT FOR
AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND BY
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES
AND
RESPECT FOR
AND ENFORCEMENT OF AMENDMENT 14,
SECTION 3
AS VALID TO ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES AS PART OF THIS
SECTION 3
AS VALID TO ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES AS PART OF THIS
CONSTITUTION
“No person shall hold any office,
civil or military, under the United States, who having
previously taken an oath as an officer of
previously taken an oath as an officer of
the United States to support the Constitution of the United
States, shall have
engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same”
engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same”
AND
AGREE THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS NOT ONLY
BETRAYED
HIS TRUST
HIS TRUST
IN MANY WAYS,
INCLUDING FAILURE TO TAKE CARE THAT
THE
THE
SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND BE FAITHFULLY
EXECUTED
WITH
WITH
RESPECT TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS*
AND
COULD BE
REMOVED FROM OFFICE ON IMPEACHMENT
FOR AND CONVICTION OF TREASON EXCEPT THAT
FOR AND CONVICTION OF TREASON EXCEPT THAT
ARTICLE III,
SECTION 3 DEFINES TREASON AS SOMETHING
OTHER THAN BETRAYAL OF A TRUST
OTHER THAN BETRAYAL OF A TRUST
BUT
PRESIDENT
OBAMA IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE RE-ELECTED
AS PRESIDENT BECAUSE
AS PRESIDENT BECAUSE
HE HAS
ENGAGED IN
REBELLION AGAINST THE CONGRESS AND THE
CONSTITUTION IN MANY
WAYS DESIGNED TO REDUCE WE
THE PEOPLE UNDER ABSOLUTE DESPOTISM
THE PEOPLE UNDER ABSOLUTE DESPOTISM
THEREFORE
HE SHOULD
NOT APPEAR ON THE BALLOT FOR THIS
ELECTION AND
ELECTION AND
WE THE
PEOPLE, CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES, IN
BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES, ARE HEREBY DEMANDING
THAT THE
BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES, ARE HEREBY DEMANDING
THAT THE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY REMOVE PRESIDENT OBAMA’S
NAME FROM ITS BALLOT PURSUANT TO
ADMENDMENT 14, SECTION 3 ABOVE
AND
NAME FROM ITS BALLOT PURSUANT TO
ADMENDMENT 14, SECTION 3 ABOVE
AND
IF THEY DO
NOT, THEN ALL VOTES FOR OBAMA WILL
BE
BE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND OF NO FORCE OR
EFFECT
UNLESS
CONGRESS,
BY A VOTE OF TWO-THIRDS OF EACH HOUSE,
PASSED SUCH DISABILITY
PASSED SUCH DISABILITY
Signed by many patriotic citizens who shall be named if called
upon to do so. We the people of the United States are
disillusioned by this
upon to do so. We the people of the United States are
disillusioned by this
fraudulent individual who sits in the Oval Office of our
White House. He must be immediately removed
according to the Constitutional Law of the United States
of America.
AUGUST 13,
2012
*ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
Definition of: A person who unlawfully comes willingly
and without authority into a foreign land to
make his home whether to do good or to do bad.
*IMMIGRANT
An individual who enters a foreign land willfully with approval
from his maiden homeland and with lawful procedures of
entry into a foreign land. Any deviation of this procedure
is unlawful and the entrants called, ILLEGAL ALIENS.
THEREFORE MAKING THESE INDIVIDUALS
FELONS AND UNLAWFUL TO BE GRANTED AMNESTY
WITHOUT FULL APPROVAL OF THE CONGRESS OF
THE UNITED STATES.
Monday, August 6, 2012
OBAMA'S ATTACK ON THE CONSTITUTION!
Urgent Message from
Michael
ReaganGod Save US from King
Obama
Dear Friend:It’s taken more than 200 years, two world wars, an industrial revolution, and the dawn of the Internet, but the United States once again finds itself at the mercy of an intolerant king.
Instead of a tax on tea, King Barack Obama and his Knights of the Fast Food Table seem intent on imposing a penalty on chicken — but not all chicken.
They are only targeting poultry prepared by Chick-fil-A.
And it’s not because King Obama has decreed that Chick-fil-A makes a product that is any way unsuitable for the American people. It’s because Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy had the audacity to make comments supporting the “biblical definition” of marriage as between a man and a woman — comments that directly conflict with the King’s recent pronouncement on gay marriage.
Cathy’s comments have undoubtedly infuriated the petulant king and his court, so much so that King Obama’s mayors in Boston and Chicago issued proclamations of their own aimed at stopping further expansion of Chick-fil-A restaurants in their cities.
This is nothing short of outrageous behavior by a king who is obviously out of touch with the rest of us peasants.
King Obama’s rule is so egregious in fact that the traditionally left ACLU has weighed in on the side of Chick-fil-A. A senior attorney for the ACLU of Illinois reportedly told an interviewer that any government that can exclude a business for being against same-sex marriage, can also exclude a business for being in support of same-sex marriage.
It shows you how far to the left Obama and his allies have gone when the ACLU can’t support its positions.
Unfortunately, the King’s bad behavior doesn’t stop with the food we eat. Part of King Obama’s healthcare law also took effect this week. It will essentially force most employer-based insurance systems to provide contraceptive services.
The implementation of the healthcare mandate comes less than a week after a federal judge in Colorado temporarily blocked the government from enforcing its contraception requirement on the Denver-based Hercules Industry, a private manufacturer of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment, which is run by a Catholic family.
This is a case where King Obama’s Justice Department offered the head of Hercules a choice: Either give your employees free contraception or surrender your company to the crown.
Put another way, give up your company, or give up your religion.
Not only is my father probably rolling over in his grave right now, but I would be so bold to say that FDR and John F. Kennedy are too.
We have a president who thinks he’s a king. And America cannot afford a king who can so cavalierly discard the U.S. Constitution when it doesn’t suit his political agenda.
I find it somewhat ironic that while the Justice Department is asking people to surrender their religion and their companies, and even some wealthy Democrats are giving up their passports to escape the tyranny of King Obama.
I am urging you to join with the League of American Voters to support our national efforts to expose President Obama and his allies in Washington. This is an extremely critical year, so please act today - Go Here Now
Michael Reagan is the son of President Ronald Reagan. He is national chairman of the League of American Voters.
ARNOLD J. NASS
August 6, 2012
(Pay attention my fellow Americans)
AMENDMENT
14, SECTION 3
(Copied as
applied to President)
“No person
shall hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, who, having
previously taken an oath, as an officer of the United States to support the
Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or
rebellion against the same”.
IS THERE
ANY QUESTION THAT OBAMA TOOK THE OATH OF HIS OFFICE AND HAS ENGAGED IN
INSURRECTION OR REBELLION AGAINST THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
THE FEDERAL
ELECTION COMMITTEE MAKES ALL THE ELECTION LAWS;
BUT THE
POLITICAL PARTY DECIDES WHO CAN BE ON THE PARTIES TICKET FOR ELECTION IN THE
PRIMARY AND THEN THE PARTY VOTERS DECIDE WHO CAN BE ON ITS BALLOT FOR ELECTION.
SO,
HOW CAN WE
REMOVE OBAMA FROM THE DEMOCRATIC BALLOT FOR THIS ELECTION IN NOVEMBER?
THE SUPPER
PAC FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
CROSSROADS
MEDIA
WHO DO WE
CONTACT FOR THAT
Sunday, August 5, 2012
Patriot or Traitor: When will Obama crack in public?By Mychal Massie...
Patriot or Traitor:
When will Obama crack in public?
By Mychal Massie...: When will Obama crack in public? By Mychal Massie At a time when many Americans can barely afford Burger King and a movie, Obama...
When will Obama crack in public?
By Mychal Massie...: When will Obama crack in public? By Mychal Massie At a time when many Americans can barely afford Burger King and a movie, Obama...
|
When will Obama
crack in public?
By Mychal Massie At a time when many Americans can barely afford Burger King and a movie, Obama boasts of spending a billion dollars on his re-election campaign. Questioned at a recent appearance about the spiraling fuel costs, Obama said, "Get used to it" – and with an insouciant grin and chortle, he told another person at the event, who complained about the effect high fuel prices were having on his family, to "get a more fuel-efficient car." The Obamas behave as if they were sharecroppers living in a trailer and hit the Powerball, but instead of getting new tires for their trailer and a new pickup truck, they moved to Washington . And instead of making possum pie, with goats and chickens in the front yard, they're spending and living large at taxpayer expense – opulent vacations, gala balls, resplendent dinners and exclusive command performances at the White House, grand date nights, golf, basketball, more golf, exclusive resorts and still more golf. In the 1950's they called it acting NIGGER RICH. Expensive, ill-fitting and ill-chosen wigs and fashions hardly befit the first lady of the United States . The Obamas have behaved in every way but presidential – which is why it's so offensive when we hear Obama say, in order "to restore fiscal responsibility, we all need to share in the sacrifice – but we don't have to sacrifice the America we believe in." The American people have been sacrificing; it is he and his family who are behaving as if they've never had two nickels to rub together – and now, having hit the mother lode, they're going to spend away their feelings of inadequacy at the taxpayers' expense. Obama continues to exhibit behavior that, at best, can be described as mobocratic and, at worst, reveals a deeply damaged individual. In a February 2010 column, I asked, "Is Obama unraveling? "I wrote that it was beginning to appear the growing mistrust of him and contempt for his policies was beginning to have a destabilizing effect on him. At that time, I wrote that not having things go one's way can be a bitter pill, but reasonable people don't behave as he was behaving. He had insulted Republicans at their luncheon, where he had been an invited guest. I had speculated that was, in part, what had led him to falsely accuse Supreme Court justices before Congress, the nation and the world, during the 2010 State of the Union address. It appeared, at that time, as if he were "fraying around the emotional edges." That behavior has not abated – it has become more pronounced. While addressing the nation, after being forced to explain the validity of his unilateral aggression with Libya , America witnessed a petulant individual scowling and scolding the public for daring to insist he explain his actions. But during an afternoon speech to address the budget/debt, he took his scornful, unstable despotic behavior to depths that should give the nation cause for concern. Displaying a dark psychopathy more representative of an episode of "The Tudors" television series, he invited Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., to sit in the front row during his speech and then proceeded to berate both Ryan and Ryan's budget-cutting plan. Even liberal Democrats were put off by the act. MSNBC's Joe Scarborough questioned the sanity of Obama's actions. Today, criticism is coming from all sides. A senior Democrat lawmaker said, "I have been very disappointed in [Obama], to the point where I'm embarrassed that I endorsed him. It's so bad that some of us are thinking, is there some way we can replace him? How do you get rid of this guy?" ("Democrats' Disgust with Obama," The Daily Beast, April 15, 2011) Steve McCann wrote: Obama's speech "was chock full of lies, deceit and crass fear-mongering. It must be said that [he] is the most dishonest, deceitful and mendacious person in a position of power I have ever witnessed" ("The Mendacity of Barack Obama,"AmericanThinker.com , April 15, 2011). McCann continued: "[His] performance was the culmination of four years of outright lies and narcissism that have been largely ignored by the media, including some in the conservative press and political class who are loath to call [him] what he is in the bluntest of terms: a liar and a fraud. That he relies on his skin color to intimidate, either outright or by insinuation [against] those who oppose his radical agenda only add to his audacity. It is apparent that he has gotten away with his character flaws his entire life, aided and abetted by sycophants around him. ..." With these being among the kinder rebukes being directed at Obama, and with people becoming less intimidated by his willingness to use race as a bludgeon, with falling poll numbers in every meaningful category and an increasingly aggressive tea-party opposition – how much longer before he cracks completely? The coming months of political life are not going to be pleasant for Obama. Possessed by a self-perceived palatine mindset, that in his mind places him above criticism, how long before he cracks in public? Can America risk a man with a documented track record of lying and misrepresenting truth as a basic way of life, who is becoming increasingly more contumelious? Hope you forward this to everyone in your address book as we are going to need every vote we can get to remove Obama. The liberals are just unable to absorb what he is doing to our country and will continue to vote for him. Just imagine what he will do to America if he gets another term |
Patriot or Traitor: KEYSTONE PIPELINE -
Patriot or Traitor: KEYSTONE PIPELINE -: FACTS ON THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE PEOPLE IN THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD KNOW FACTS FROM FICTION. FACT: BITUMEN (API 6%) IS ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)